We had a bonus family movie night last night.
The Scarlet Pimpernel.
Not the 1935 version with Leslie Howard, Merle Oberon, and Raymond Massey as the villainous Chauvelin.
Black and white movies are not popular with members of this household under the age of 11.
We watched a made for TV version from the 1980s starring Anthony Andrews, a strangely unbeautiful Jane Seymour (must have been the wigs), and, as Chauvelin, Ian McKellen, looking disconcertingly young and boyish for Gandalf and even more disconcertingly like a young Leonard Nimoy as Spock without the pointed ears.
It wasn't bad. The teenager enjoyed immensely and wants to read the book. The ten year old hated it.
"That was the boringest family movie night ever," he said as he was climbing into bed.
"You didn't like it at all?" I asked.
"I liked some of the rescue parts but the rest was all talk talk talk. No action."
He was expecting a real swashbuckler with lots of sword fights. We recently watched Erroll Flynn's Robin Hood. That's his idea of an adventure movie.
Even though I can do a pretty good impression of Leslie Howard reciting Sir Percy's Ode to the Scarlet Pimpernel---"They seek him heyah, they seek him theyah, those Frenchies seek him everywheyah..."---I don't remember much else from Howard's Pimpernel, which, because I saw the movie when I was a kid, I suspect must mean that it didn't have enough action in it either or it would have impressed my ten year old self more and stuck with me.
In the version we watched last night the main dramatic tension is in whether or not Sir Percy and Margueritte will ever learn to trust each other again and whether or not the oily Chauvelin will coerce Margueritte into helping him capture the Pimpernel, a subplot that would have had more zing if Margueritte liked Chauvelin and was attracted to him and, in her hurt and loneliness at being rejected by her husband, she was tempted to turn to him for "comfort." She's doesn't, isn't, and wouldn't, not in a million years, even if he was the last man on earth, so Seymour and McKellen's scenes have a "You must pay the rent!" "I can't pay the rent!" quality to them that's decidely unsexy and even less suspenseful.
"Did you like it?" the ten year old asked.
"I thought it was pretty good," I said. "I wish there'd been a few more swordfights too though."
"Did Matt really like it?" he asked.
"He says he did."
"How come?" He couldn't believe his brother could have enjoyed a movie that didn't have the required amount of swordfights or gunplay and featured instead all that kissing and sighing.
"He's a teenager now," I said. "He's becoming more interested in the characters. He wants to know what grown ups are like. He's trying to figure out how to be one so he's paying more attention to what's called the psychological aspect of stories."
"That's what's great about still being a kid," the ten year old kid said.
"What's that?"
"You don't have to deal with all these new aspects."
For fun swashbucklers there are two fairly forgotten movies from years ago. I remembered them lately because my kids (10 and 8) were watching Pirates of the Carribean and then Field of Dreams. Burt Lancaster made two great movies early on when he was coming off being a circus acrobat. The one I remember was called, "The Crimson Pirate." He and his mute sidekick acrobat their way through the movie evading the king's soldiers and just gleefully monkeying about in the masts and spars of the pirate ships. Then Lancaster made another one that was something like William Tell - set in Northern Italy. But it had the same trapeze like acrobatics in it. Wonderful movies. The local movie stores don't have them and neither does the library up the street. Netflix might.
Ed
Posted by: Ed D. | Tuesday, September 05, 2006 at 09:08 AM
Your ten year old is wise beyond his years. Gotta love him!
Posted by: Rosy | Tuesday, September 05, 2006 at 11:51 AM
In "They Might Be Giants" you know there is magic in the air when Jack Gilford confesses to Sherlock Holmes/Judge Justin Playfair/George C Scott that he always wanted to be The Scarlett Pimpernel and then he launches into that bit of doggerel, but without imitating Leslie Howard. "The Crimson Pirate" was filmed in that garish but glorious Technicolor, which has disappeared over time.
Posted by: Exiled in New Jersey | Tuesday, September 05, 2006 at 12:20 PM
Yes, indeed, the 10-year-old is one smart kid.
I've heard in other quarters that younger viewers truly hate black and white movies. What a shame. I can't imagine why this is so. No movie is "real" so what does it matter if a flick isn't in color?
Imagine The Third Man in color! Yuck.
Posted by: Kevin Wolf | Tuesday, September 05, 2006 at 02:06 PM
I'll third the 10 year old being a smart one. There's plenty of time for all those new aspects.
Blue Kid's 14 and he'll only now even consider watching a black and white movie. I've never understood it either. They must relate it to the "olden days" or something. The boringest days ever!
Posted by: blue girl | Tuesday, September 05, 2006 at 03:16 PM
Tip for converting color-only viewers to B&W: Raging Bull. Blood and guts all over the place.
Posted by: Linkmeister | Tuesday, September 05, 2006 at 03:23 PM
By Jove, I've only just now made a connection that it embarrasses me no end I never made before! The Kinks' "Dedicated Follower of Fashion":
They seek him here
They seek him there
In Regent Street
And Leicester Square...
Back to the Classics before my brain shrivels completely. It nearly dropped out of my head at last night's wild Baroness Orczy. (Sorry.)
Actually, last night we didn't have an Orczy at all but watched Preston Sturges' incandescent "Sullivan's Travels," whence the title for "O Brother, Where Art Thou?" They don't make 'em like that anymore. Not that anybody but me cared.
Posted by: Neddie Jingo | Tuesday, September 05, 2006 at 04:17 PM
I saw that TV version ages ago, and if memory serves it actually reduced some of the swordplay from the 1935 version. I like that one better but wouldn't show it to a 10-year-old, it is a little too antique! I remember reading an interview with Tony Curtis after he did a TV version of The Count of Monte Cristo, with Richard Chamberlain, saying he hated doing latter-day swashbucklers because nobody knew how to handle a sword any more (he said Chamberlain was an exception).
If the newly double-digit Mannion heir likes the Flynn Robin Hood, I heartily 2nd Ed D.'s suggestion of The Crimson Pirate, also suggest Scaramouche with Stewart Granger--the longest and possibly the best swordfight of all time. Also The Black Swan.
One swordplay movie I would like to see again is Swashbuckler, from 1976. I am quite sure it is no work of art but when I saw it as a kid I enjoyed it a lot. Of course Filmbrain recently had a post about re-viewing Lost Horizon. When he saw it as a kid he was convinced it was the greatest movie ever made. Alas, age withered the hell out of it.
Slightly indignant aside to Mr. Jingo: I care!
Posted by: Campaspe | Tuesday, September 05, 2006 at 09:38 PM
I love the Musketeers and consider Scaramouche and Captain Blood immense fun, but there is a limit. The Scarlet Pimpernel is plodding, over-ornate, nose-on-your-face obvious, fifth-rate melodrama.
Posted by: Mike Schilling | Wednesday, September 06, 2006 at 02:53 AM
There is a two-dvd set of Richard Lester's Three and Four Musketeers with Oliver Reed, Michael York, Richard Chamberlain and Frank Finlay playing the foursome, Raquelle Welch in a priceless comedic role, great villainy from Faye Dunaway, Christopher Lee and Charlton Heston and one heck of a swordfight at the end of Four Ms between Lee and York that shows just how hard swordfighting is physically. Roy Kinnear is also delicious, and Lester directs with his typical panache....what are you waiting for, the ten year old will love it.
Posted by: Exiled in New Jersey | Wednesday, September 06, 2006 at 08:01 AM
Exiled: yes, Swashbuckler was blatantly imitating the Lester films, but didn't duplicate their success.
Posted by: Campaspe | Wednesday, September 06, 2006 at 09:03 AM
There's a third Lester film called "Return of the Musketeers", based loosely on _Twnety Years After_. For completists only, I'm afraid.
Posted by: Mike Schilling | Wednesday, September 06, 2006 at 01:56 PM