My Photo

Welcome to Mannionville

  • Politics, art, movies, television, books, parenting, home repair, caffeine addiction---you name it, we blog it. Since 2004. Call for free estimate.

The Tip Jar


  • Please help keep this blog running strong with your donation

Help Save the Post Office: My snail mail address

  • Lance Mannion
    109 Third St.
    Wallkill, NY 12589
    USA

Save a Blogger From Begging...Buy Stuff


The one, the only

Sister Site

« How can we help? | Main | Mini Mart Shortage? »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Leah A

Fascinating.

In my mind, this post is linked to the on-going discussion of the hydra-headed hostility to Clinton and Gore.

First of all, why is it accepted dogma that wanting to be President says something weirdly awful about the person who does? The constant press juxtasposition of Gore's ambitions, (the horror of his changing wardrobe selections as tokens of his ruthless no-holds-barred pursuit of power, the derisive snickerings about his having no other life than his desire to be President, despite the clear evidence of his variety of interests and his ability to write an actual book without a ghost writer), compared to Bush's supposed more "relaxed" attitude toward becoming President, as if he had this rich life on "the ranch" to go back to if he didn't make it.

Aside from it being a total crock, why was that a superior attitude, and how on earth could the press maintain that illusion after Bush v. Gore?

2nd point: what you're doing in this post, Lance, is precisely what the press seemed incapable of doing with Clinton or Gore or Hart - to understand that such press rumminations on a candidate's character is a form of story telling that can only approach any useful truth when the storyteller manages to connect the story of any particular candidate to what makes the rest of us human.

Instead, with Clinton, "character" became a word that signified whether you had a "good" character, which seemed also to mean that you were without sin. And the Washington press corps showed themselves to be unfamiliar with any of the great novels of the Western tradition; does Emma Bovary have "character;" does Able Magwitch?

This kind of stimulation to my own thinking is what I come here for. Plus the pleasure of the actual writing.

as always, thank-you.

Linkmeister

Re Wolfe's line, it was captured by Kipling, too: too much ego in his cosmos.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Data Analysis

  • Data Analysis

Categories

August 2019

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Movies, Music, Books, Kindles, and more

For All Your Laundry Needs

In Case of Typepad Emergency Break Glass

Be Smart, Buy Books


Blog powered by Typepad