Mitt and his minions have been handling their latest Bain problems with their usual mix of courage, aplomb, forth-rightness, and political savvy. Which is to say they've been tripping all over themselves, muddling their own message, and generally making things worse while desperately begging a sympathetic press corps to clean it all up for them or at least change the subject. But when it is over and the press corps does move on I think it might very well have boiled down to this.
Mitt did leave Bain when he said he did but for various legal and business reasons his name stayed at the top of the company flow chart. This may have violated a bunch of paper rules but still Mitt is telling a sort of truth. He was a figurehead when he says he was a figurehead.
It would be a lot easier to understand and defend if the company had been called Romney Forge and Foundry and made widgets. Mitt could simply show that he was far out of town and not in contact with anyone at the factory when a batch of defective widgets came down the line.
But so what? It doesn't change the essential fact about Bain Capital.
Bain didn't make widgets. It didn't do anything except make a few people rich at the expense of dozens of American communities and thousands of American workers. This is what Mitt himself designed it to do. This is what it it did when he was running the show. It was what it continued to do while he was off running the Olympics. Sending jobs overseas was just one way it took work away from Americans. The key thing is that taking jobs away from American workers was intrinsic to the process of making those few people rich.
You can argue that “creative destruction” is a necessary and even ultimately beneficial economic function, but it's like arguing that crows, buzzards, jackals, and hyenas are important to the food chain---true but it doesn't turn a buzzard into an eagle or a jackal into a lion.
Mitt wasn’t an entrepreneur. He was a scavenger.

I agree that the larger story is what a scam private equity is. Let's also talk about "carried interest", the tax loophole that turns what should be ordinary income into capital gains, and is part of why Romney only paid a 14% tax rate. Or how he managed to get so much money in his IRA. Or why he has so many offshore accounts.
But what I think happened with his leaving Bain is that he didn't decide to actually leave Bain until he wanted to run for governor instead of coming back. He took a leave of absence to run the Olympics, but wanted to at least leave open the possibility of coming back. I guess he thinks that saying he was on leave makes him look more responsible for the outsourcing than saying he was retired, which is why he keeps saying he was retired despite the conflicting paperwork he filed.
Posted by: Sherri | Friday, July 13, 2012 at 11:50 AM
with few exceptions the scavengers in nature's order aren't the killers. bain scavenging worked differently. they kill, then they let it rot for a while, then they gorge.
a particularly disgusting way to do it. komodo dragons do that. they make a single bite on the leg of a water buffalo. it infects and weeks later the buffalo dies an angonizing death and leaves a pre-rotted corpse for the dragon to chow down upon.
Posted by: minstrel hussain boy | Friday, July 13, 2012 at 12:12 PM
Ah, we get some more information on why Romney can't easily explain away those three years he was/wasn't at Bain: he needed to at least sort of be at Bain in order to run for governor in Massachusetts. (http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/07/romney-testified-he-maintained-business-ties-during-olympics.php?ref=fpa)
Posted by: Sherri | Friday, July 13, 2012 at 01:54 PM
It doesn't explain away this, however:
http://www.villagevoice.com/2012-04-18/news/Mitt-Romney-american-parasite/
Posted by: actor212 | Friday, July 13, 2012 at 03:53 PM
No, it doesn't, actor212. The thing is, Romney's not unique there. That's how private equity works! That's how it worked back in the 80's when it was known as leveraged buyout, before Michael Milken made that sound bad. It still works that way. Use other people's money to borrow more money to buy companies, cut the costs of the companies to borrow even more money to pay back your investors and pay yourself management fees (and, oh, by the way, use a ridiculous tax loophole to make those fees look like capital gains), then if everything holds together long enough and the stock market is favorable, take the company public, take your bump from the IPO, and move on to the next target. If it doesn't hold together, the company goes into bankruptcy, and you move on, because you've already gotten your money and the debts belong to the company, not you. That pension you gutted? The taxpayers are on the hook for that.
It's a great deal for the investors. Not so much for the workers.
Posted by: Sherri | Friday, July 13, 2012 at 04:50 PM
To be fair, eagles can also function as scavengers.
Posted by: Joe | Monday, July 16, 2012 at 08:14 PM
Joe, true. Also to be fair, I have a fondness for crows.
Posted by: Lance Mannion | Tuesday, July 17, 2012 at 07:11 AM
Of course he's a scavenger. But that's not the question to be asking. It's whether or not he's a bigger scavenger than Obama. And I don't think he is. Obama is a lawyer, and they are the ultimate scavengers, raking off infinite amounts of money from our society and not contributing anything whatsoever. And remember that it's the lawyers that enable the Romneys. Without the wholehearted cooperation and assistance of the legal community the elite would never be able to engage in systemic and systematic violation of the laws, which is what they're doing.
Posted by: mike | Thursday, July 19, 2012 at 01:34 PM
Mike, actually, I think of lawyers as parasites, like pilot fish or those little birds that ride on the backs of black rhinos.
There are all kinds of lawyers, though. There are the corporate and tax attorneys rich guys like Romney consult to avoid paying taxes. And then there's the Eric Schneiderman, the New York State Attorney General, who's going after the shady wheeler dealers on Wall Street and David Boies and Ted Olson who worked so hard to get Proposition 8 overturned. Abraham Lincoln was a lawyer, Clarence Darrow was a lawyer, my great uncle was a lawyer who mostly wrote wills and handled real estate closings for not very rich people. President Obama is a lawyer but practiced very little law.
And there are all kinds of business people, some of whom actually build things, including roads and bridges (under contracts from state, local, and federal governments). There's no "of course" about being a scavenger. It depends on what sort of business you go into and how you go about it. Mitt chose not to build anything but his own personal wealth and he did it by scavenging.
Posted by: Lance Mannion | Sunday, July 22, 2012 at 09:11 AM