« Rumpole v. Bain Capital |
| Politico and Newt, made for each other »
Lance Mannion on Monday, March 19, 2012 in Now Playing at Cine 1001-2000 | Permalink
| Digg This
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451be5969e20168e8fb9e78970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 21 Jump Street:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
It gets worse. The sequel has already been green-lighted [green-lit?]:
I heard this the day *before* the movie was released, but today's the first day I've seen it in print, suggesting last week's news was simply the studio's official pump-priming rumor.
Quote that says it all: "The biggest question mark will likely be directors Chris Miller and Phil Lord, who are currently working on the Lego movie, and will no doubt be flooded by offers as "Jump Street" continues to rake in cash."
The Lego movie. Really?
Monday, March 19, 2012 at 12:35 PM
Careful. You'll offend Brad DeLong, who's related to one of "Jump Street's" producers/directors/something.
Monday, March 19, 2012 at 03:58 PM
I would never hold that against Brad DeLong.
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 at 12:00 AM
Phil Lord (Brad's cousin) and Chris Miller now have made two fun movies the greatest crime of which is that have very little relationship to their alleged source material (names are the same, but characters are different).
I can list many people who have done much worse.
And three stars from Ebert isn't exactly "this will live on with Chinatown, Z00, and The Conversation"; more "you'll get good value if you just want to have fun."
We need a Mannion essay on Sources and Uses; e.g., why 21 Jump Street works and the Uma Thurman/Sean Connery Avengers didn't, though looking at casts, that wouldn't have been the Way to Bet.
Ken Houghton |
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 at 10:00 AM
I saw it. I thought it was funny, though of course it won't be to everyone's tastes.
I'm surprised that you're surprised that this got made, considering that 90% of what Hollywood releases is a sequel, prequel, spin-off, remake, re-imagining, or adaptation of a book or tv series.
Thursday, March 22, 2012 at 11:53 AM
Yes, I know. I had the exact same thought when I heard the news.
Friday, March 23, 2012 at 12:31 AM
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
(You can use HTML tags like <b> <i> and <ul> to style your text.)
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Name is required to post a comment
Please enter a valid email address
Veep: Season 2
Guardians of the Galaxy
How to Train Your Dragon 2
Live Die Repeat: Edge of Tomorrow
X-Men: Days of Future PastLance's Review
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire
Captain America: The Winter SoldierLance's Review
Muppets Most Wanted
The Americanization of Emily
William Gildea: The Longest Fight: In the Ring with Joe Gans, Boxing's First African American ChampionLance's Review
Joshua M. Glasser: The Eighteen-Day Running Mate: McGovern, Eagleton, and a Campaign in CrisisLance's Review
Gary Krist: City of Scoundrels: The 12 Days of Disaster That Gave Birth to Modern ChicagoLance's Review
Lou Berney: Whiplash River: A NovelLance's Review
Christopher Moore: Sacre Bleu: A Comedy d'ArtLance's Review
Tabish Khair: The Thing about ThugsLance's Review
Hali Felt: Soundings: The Story of the Remarkable Woman Who Mapped the Ocean FloorLance's Review
Michael Frayn: Skios: A NovelLance's Review
Paul Hendrickson: Hemingway's Boat: Everything He Loved in Life, and Lost Lance's Review