Don't know what to make of the news that membership in organized religions is down across the United States.
That's not quite true. I've been trying not to let myself make anything of it. For one thing, I'd just be talking out of my hat. I don't know enough. None of the articles I've read get very deeply into people's reasons why they've left the faiths of their fathers and mothers behind or into the question of what it means to them that they're keeping the Sabbath by not going to church...or temple...or mosque...or shul. For another, I'm afraid that I'd just be flattering my own prejudices or stoking the fires of old angers.
But I can't help noting that the biggest drop has occurred among Catholics. This doesn't surprise me, on the one hand, but baffles me on the other. What's baffling to me is that the drop is so small. For the life of me, I can't understand why anybody is still a Catholic anymore.
Shoot. Hear I go. Bless me, father, for I am about to sin. I'm giving in to my prejudices and angers.
Over at Andrew Sullivan's place, a commenter reports that Massachusetts is a lot less Catholic than it used to be and attributes that to Bay Staters' disgust and fury at the pedophile scandals and Archbishop Law's attempt to cover it up. Which makes perfect sense. I can't sit in church without looking at the men in dresses on the altar and thinking, "Were you one of them or were you one of the cowards who looked the other way?"
I've asked still-practicing Catholics I know how they can stomach the sight of these creeps or creep-protectors. Most of them are able to see past the priests to the Man and God they represent. They go to mass for communion, and they don't mean the wine and the wafer. They mean the company of other Catholics and the feeling of being close to Christ. During the gospels and the sermons they listen to the message not the messengers.
For the record, my break with the Church is only tangentially related to the fact that for twenty or thirty or even more years it was running a giant child molestation ring. The priests I knew when I was an altar boy were not pedophiles. The only proof I have of this, though, is that they left me and, as far as I know, my friends alone and that over a short span of time almost all of them left the priesthood to get married. My break with the church came much later and it was in a fight with our parish school over getting help for our son, who we were just beginning to figure out had learning disabilities and developmental problems we would later learn to call Asperger's. Basically, I learned that every priest in our diocese I talked to, from our pastor on up to the bishop, was willing to throw our kid away. They all thought he was our problem that we were lazily and irresponsibly trying to make their problem and they pretty much out and out accused of being rotten parents and of raising a bad kid. He was seven and a half at the time, by the way.
So the last priest I ever talked to seriously I told to go to hell.
And that was it for me. I was done. I'd been holding onto my faith by the threads of a frayed alb anyway. As soon as it became impossible for me to sit in a church without wanting to heave a missal at the priest saying the mass I realized I didn't believe anymore and in fact hadn't for a long, long time. I'd been using the rituals and the nostalgia to distract me from my apostacy.
Shortly after that, the scandals hit the news and I couldn't help thinking, Oh sure, that's what you want little boys around for.
I'm not sure anything could have brought me back, but it doesn't help that the Church's only response to the scandal has still been to pay victims to shut up and go away and demonize homosexuals. Oh, and blame some of the kids for being seductive.
Because it's not really child abuse if the child is over twelve.
There were, and are, other things that bothered me about the Church. But I used to tell myself that it would come around, eventually, on birth control, letting priests marry, allowing women to become priests. It still might, although it's not going to happen under a pope who condones lunacy like this.
Maybe I should have come to my senses sooner and left because of the backwardness, the misogyny, the homophobia, and the hypocrisy of Catholic bishops condemning Pro-Choice Democratic politicians while giving their tacit support to Pro-choice and pro-Death Penalty Republicans. It shouldn't have taken a personal quarrel with a handful of scared and stupid men. But there it is.
The long and the short of it is that there are a lot of people who have good reason to be furious with the Catholic Church, to hate it and its minions with all their hearts, and that's why it baffles me that, even with the influx of Hispanic Catholics in the West and Southwest and big cities back East, the number of people identifying themselves as practicing Catholics hasn't dropped even more than it has.
There. I've given into the one temptation, anger. Now for the other.
As I said, the articles I've read don't give enough reason to know why so many people have given up on religion. I'm sure education has something to do with it. Fundamentalists fear and blame Darwin for threatening everybody's faith in a special creation for human beings, but really once you get a glimmer of how vast the universe is and know how old it is and what it's made of, it has to be hard to maintain your faith in a God for Whom human beings are at the center of His thoughts, which, of course, is why the Religious Right is anti-science not just anti-Darwin. Intelligent Design---Creationism---isn't just about teaching that God created the universe. It's about how biology, geology, astronomy, and physics are all wrong. "Teaching the controversy" is literally about teaching that a legitimate alternative to scientific thinking is a belief in magic, fairy tales, and just-so stories.
But it also can't help God's side that His public face is the charlatans and mountebanks the Media has designated as the spokesmen for religion or that the Media seems to think that the only religious people in the United States are Right Wing Protestant Fundamentalists and Right Wing Jews and Catholics who ape their politics.
For thirty years or more the Media has been so desperate to win over Right Wing audiences by flattering them and fawning over them that they've failed to notice what a lunatic brand of religion is being practiced by these people.
And it's not just the magical thinking. It's the hatred. And the fear.
Of sex, of women, of gays, of freedom of thought, of people who aren't Americans, of Americans who aren't "Christian," of art, of joy, of life itself.
There have been reports that younger Evangelicals have begun to notice this about their parents' religion, that even some of the parents are questioning it themselves. They're becoming concerned that the Religious Right has identified itself with the Republican Right so closely that it has become indistinguishable from it, that they've adopted a political cause not a faith and are rendering to Caesar what they ought to be rendering up to God.
I don't know.
The stories that report a drop in membership in other religions report that there's been an increase among Evangelicals. Not all Evangelicals are Right Wing Fundamentalists, but still.
Maybe, though, it's the case that these young people are strong enough in their beliefs that they feel they can take their churches back from their preachers.
Some days I almost wish I felt that way about Catholicism.
Ash Wednesday the blonde came home with a black smudge on her forehead and I was jealous. I wished I could have gone to church and believed something good was happening when the priest pressed his thumb to my head. But I know better. As far as I'm concerned, Ashes to ashes, dust to dust is a simple statement of a biological fact, and isn't that a sad and lonely thought some days.
________________________
Second reading: Michael Spencer sees a coming Evangelical collapse.
"for twenty or thirty or even more years it was running a giant child molestation ring"
Hmmm...I wonder if you have misplaced a zero or two in your estimate?
"The long and the short of it is that there are a lot of people who have good reason to be furious with the Catholic Church, to hate it and its minions with all their hearts, and that's why it baffles me that, ... , the number of people identifying themselves as practicing Catholics hasn't dropped even more than it has."
This too surely stretches back to antiquity, and the reasons that people stick with the church now are probably related to the reasons that they put up that nonsense for millenia. Once you enter the cage of civilization, all social power derives from a form of protection racket. So the mystery is, what do people think they are being protected from? Since most people feel pain in the moment a little more sharply than an imagined pain way off in the future, I guess the church must have the means to make many people's lives more, or less, comfortable, according to their whim. The Confessional is a small example whereby the Catholic church allows people to act against their personal morality without having to make amends in real life (i.e. the unrepentant can game the system and still come out with their conscience assuaged).
Obviously a 2000 year old institution also has many more direct and worldly methods of influencing peoples' lives than this. A lack of belief in the mythology of bronze-age Israelites is probably not sufficient to break with an entity that has been threatening you since early childhood, but fury and anger that justly arises from watching the church abuse its power is. The threshold of anger gives a clue to the level of power that the church really has, and that is what is so surprising, because a secular society with the separation of church and state was supposed to diminish that power.
Posted by: Ken Muldrew | Wednesday, March 11, 2009 at 12:48 PM
The really delicious part of the Brazilian dramedy is that the only person that the Archbishop didn't excommunicate-besides the nine year old girl-is the man who repeatedly raped his helpless, little stepdaughters.
No wonder they call his office a bishopric.
Posted by: SweetSue | Wednesday, March 11, 2009 at 01:50 PM
Lance:
I am so very sorry about your struggle to provide care for your child. My son has autism, and we have been very fortunate with our local public school.
Also, I am still a practicing Christian, and although I am about 40, I plan to go on as a divinity student this year. I would be happy to discuss with you why I still have faith in God, and I certainly would not try to convert or convince, just share. Let me know, if you like.
Posted by: Andrew | Wednesday, March 11, 2009 at 02:55 PM
Andrew,
I'm glad your local public school's helping out. Our son is 15 now and he's been doing well since we moved here. He has his ups and downs but he's had good teachers and sympathetic ears all along the way. That's great you're going to divinity school. I'd be glad if you shared your thoughts about faith, here or by email.
Posted by: Lance | Thursday, March 12, 2009 at 08:54 AM
I'm not so sure that people leaving "organized religion" means the same thing as "people abandoning religious beliefs". It seems to me that some of this is a function of American Catholics' cafeteria tradition coming home to roost. Many people still want to believe in the supernatural, but they also want to pick and choose which rules they will observe. Around Buffalo, one of the most Catholic areas in the country, there are now a number of the sort of mega-churches that feature charismatic pastors, flat screen televisions and in-house Starbucks. Does attendance at something like this constitute participation in organized religion? Not the way that expression was used when I was an alter boy. The people who attend these institutions do not necessarily identify with whatever brand name credentialed the presiding shaman-- they believe that going to church is something that good people do, and that it makes them good people if they do it. To the extent that most of them identify with the institution at all, they identify with the place where they attend, rather than with a particular theology or hierarchy. For people who want even less structure in their beliefs, with a somewhat greater sense of community there's Unitarianism. Although it doesn't seem like a very organized religion (or a religion at all) to me, locally there seem to be a number of former Catholics who now attend Unitarian services.
I also question the extent to which the pedophile scandal has had an effect on active Catholics. I'm sure there has been some, but my sense is that the major effect was on already marginalized practitioners and the already disaffected, and it seems likely to me that among these people the whole thing was as much rationalization as not.
Posted by: Bill Altreuter | Thursday, March 12, 2009 at 09:39 AM
Bill Altreuter: Does attendance at something like this constitute participation in organized religion? Not the way that expression was used when I was an alter boy. The people who attend these institutions do not necessarily identify with whatever brand name credentialed the presiding shaman...
Bill good point, great line, "presiding shaman."
Posted by: Lance | Thursday, March 12, 2009 at 07:01 PM
I am also disgusted beyong fury with the hush-hush conspiracy, the creepy obsession with women's sexuality, the irrational extremism focused on one issue (abortion) to the exclusion and betrayal of others (opposition to war, to torture, to the death penalty, take your pick).
I haven't been to Church in years. But I'm STILL a Catholic.
I believe in the Trinity, in the divinity of Jesus, the eternal life of the human soul and in the concept of Original Sin (although I tend to think of it as the responsibilities of intelligence rather than guilt-by-association). I believe in the authority of not only sacred books from many sources as collected and defined by theologians in the fourth century AD (aka the Bible), but also in the authority of the scholarship and meditations of sincere theologians, philosophers and mystics ever since. I believe in the necessity of both faith and good works, and I like to think that I at least try to base my actions on the Beatitudes.
All of which, in my book, makes me a Catholic. And no politically-tainted pedophile-hiding bureacrat in red or white robes is going to tell me otherwise.
_________
And Lance, if you're convinced that the universe is too big for a God to care about our tiny little planet, try to stop thinking in finite terms. In an infinite space, every point is the center, so for an infinite Being, all things (no matter how small) are the focus of attention.
Posted by: Saffi | Friday, March 13, 2009 at 02:22 AM
"And Lance, if you're convinced that the universe is too big for a God to care about our tiny little planet, try to stop thinking in finite terms. In an infinite space, every point is the center, so for an infinite Being, all things (no matter how small) are the focus of attention."
Good point Saffi.
I think because we live in time and space it is hard to concieve the mind of the Infinite. We're adapted to morning abloutions (which seem to get longer every morning!) spending and getting, being without things, needing things, losing things. Its a whole other country as they say in Texas.
My Dear Mother was a staunch Anglican, Church of England, you Americans can read Episcopal there and the Vactican reads "Catholic Light". She also sucessfully dabbled in Christian Science, talk about a faith that has come under hard knocks!
She wanted me to grow up religion free to find my own way without any interference from the local Shamin. I did. I got a degree in Astronomy & Physics, you can't get anymore scientific than Physics believe me. My Dad is a staunch scientist, no belief needed in God at any point in his life. He is now married to a staunch chemist , who now would like to think there is something else out there since all this went by so fast.
It hasn't all been easy, I lived in Kenya and lost a small boy I do consider the closest thing to a son for me to violent murder. My mother was decimated by the big C.
With this heady mix, I have come to such a strong belief in God that it makes me think everyday about himher. What are hisher truths, what are Our truths since we occupy different floors of the MultiVerse. I see that I have become more 'religious" than the far right could ever be and yet it has made me far more open than closed, far more flexible than inflexible and far more fearless about the unknown than most explorers I have read about.
As far as organized religion goes take it from someone who has always looked in from the outside. A religion that has staying power must have one thing going for it, and only one thing, if it doesn't have this then it dies. It must have Truth. If there is no truth then there is no future BUT and this is a big BUT>>> I find, No ONE Religion has ALL the truth but each must have some of it to survive.
I guess thats the part about keeping an open mind, kind of like God.
Posted by: Uncle Merlin | Friday, March 13, 2009 at 07:18 AM
I'm not sure anything could have brought me back, but it doesn't help that the Church's only response to the scandal has still been to pay victims to shut up and go away and demonize homosexuals. Oh, and blame some of the kids for being seductive.
Don't tell the blonde, but I think I'd like to gay marry you for these sentences.
It's been a painful and disturbing spectacle this week to watch a few American Catholics try to justify the deeply held principle underlying the hateful bigotry of their Church as something more than 'because we despise women and born children'.
Most sane American Catholics, whose tithes support a nationwide jihad here at home, a wailing and bleating of malicious lies that would shame off-off-Broadway in the legislature of any state that dares to examine the prospect of treating same-sex couples and their kids as anything more than strangers to one another under civil law, are terribly het up about this type of nonsense abroad.
Anybody recall that thing about the beam in your own eye preceding the extraction of the mote in your neighbor's?
Posted by: PhoenixRising | Friday, March 13, 2009 at 08:31 PM
You seem intelligent, but a bit arrogant. I'm sorry your child has problems. But I don't understand why you blame God. Haven't you heard of Original Sin? Also, where in the Christian religion is homosexuality and Man/Boy love taught? Who are you to judge the Creator of every cell in your body? Life is unfair, always has been, always will be. Life and death are great and terrible mysteries. Guided by God's love and our own reason we must seek our salvation in this life.
Posted by: Alan | Monday, March 16, 2009 at 10:23 PM
Alan,
Thanks for reading. You're right, I can be arrogant, and I don't like that about myself. But if you go back and re-read the post you'll see I don't blame God for anything. I don't believe in God. I'm mad at the priests who refused to help my son. I'm mad at the Church because of the abuse and the cover-ups. And maybe I'm mad about how it all revealed to me my lack of faith, but self-righteous scoldings aren't going to help me get it back.
Posted by: Lance | Tuesday, March 17, 2009 at 07:47 AM