It's not serious foreign policy if it doesn't kill people

The McEwan asks why the Los Angeles Times thinks Hillary Clinton's experience as first lady meeting with world leaders doesn't count for much because she was focusing on "women's and children's issues."

The McEwan has a good guess why.  But there's another reason too:

Because, as every serious pundit knows, serious foreign policy is all about blowing shit up.

If Clinton had wanted to be serious, instead of trying to solve those women and children's unserious issues, she'd have devoted her time to turning those women and children into collateral damage.

That's how the Maverick and Commander's going to handle it.

Comments

[judith]

EXACTLY!!

[Kim]

Zbigniew Brzezinski(sp?,an Obama adviser,compared Clinton to Mamie Eisenhower the other day. I was not amused.

[Samuel]

Collateral damage, one of the worst words in the language.