It's not impossible that they're right
After reminding us of d-squared's dictum that "there is no fancy Latin term for the fallacy of giving known liars the benefit of the doubt'," Scott Lemieux applies it to the Kenneth Pollack and Michael O'Hanlon's op-ed in the New York Times arguing that things are getting better, "militarily", on the ground in Iraq:
|
Let's pretend for a moment that a military victory in Iraq is possible without a political solution. What would it look like?
It would look a lot of dead Iraqis we could label as al-Qaeda and a big enough drop in American casualties in a time frame chosen specifically to highlight that drop so that serious people could declare that peace with honor had come at last and then it would look like a lot of Bush League triumphalism on the TV. Such a "victory" may be achievable, but its only point will be to allow George Bush, the neo-cons, and their apologists and enablers in the Media, like O'Hanlon and Pollock, to thump themselves on the chest and roar their manly roars as they hand over the mess they made to the next President.




Comments