Their virtual money is worth more than the analog money in your wallet
|
I'm actually sympathetic to the music, television, and movie industry's feelings about piracy, although as Susie Madrak points out a lot of people who express these feelings are the same people who pretty much think the artists who make the music, TV shows, and movies ought to be about as well-compensated for their work as Scrooge felt about what he was paying Cratchitt before the ghosts showed up. But this idea that the theft of intellectual property is a more serious crime than robbing people at gunpoint is a good expression of the attitude ruining American businesses every day---nevermind the millions you made last year, the millions you think you could have made are the point, and if you didn't make those you as good as lost them...or they were as good as robbed from you at gunpoint.
Oh, and money, even theoretical money, is more important than people and the cops work for the rich not for all of us.




You don't even want to get me started on this subject. The trade groups pushing this BS about lost billions ought to be deeply ashamed.
Posted by: Kevin Wolf | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 07:29 AM
Crimes against me are far more heinous than crimes against you, and crimes against him are downright trivial.
Posted by: Mike Schilling | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 07:31 AM
I'm with Kevin Wolf.
Posted by: Ken Houghton | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 08:09 AM
and may god bless crapitalism!
Posted by: harry near indy | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 08:50 AM
Anyone know coined the word, piracy, for this?
Wikipedia uses it across the board for hip hop artists and not at all for visual artists, who have appropriated Master works 'ironically'--isn't the word "ironic" done yet?--only to reap everything MOMA can give them, because they've painted a yellow splotch where the original used sepia.
But then how serious can piracy be, billions lost or not, if it puts everyone in mind of Johnny Depp all but lost off screen in that last movie?
Posted by: Kathleen Maher | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 09:22 AM
It would be funnier if you referenced an NBC comedy in your intro. Not that Doogie's show doesn't apply. I'm just tweaking other people's writing rather than trying to do anything with my own.
Posted by: velvet goldmine | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:43 AM
Ed Schultz on the Jones Radio Network has been using a phrase a lot lately: "Race to the bottom line" that I think captures this idea perfectly. The almighty capitalist dollar is far more important than the people who create or even the people who partake. It is a shortsighted view: indeed, so shortsighted that it looks backward at what it 'should' have made but didn't, and was therefore stolen from them. It results in suing high school students instead of utilizing new media and new delivery systems for a new approach.
I have a number of friends who are artists. Some utilize the Creative Commons license, some simply post their songs or stories on the web, glad to have an audience. It seems that business today thinks it *deserves* an "audience" no matter how crappy the product or how badly it treats that same audience.
Posted by: Vir Modestus | Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 11:49 AM
I do see a distinction between the amorphous mass of downloader pirates, and the organised criminal piracy that sells dodgy DVDs and CDs.
Heck, why am I falling for the "piracy" label? But the downloaders aren't the ones likely to resolve their business disputes with guns. Which is possibly why the downloaders are targets: they don't snoot back.
Posted by: Dave Bell | Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 07:12 AM