Data Analysis

  • Data Analysis

Bob's Watches

The one, the only

Sister Site

« The coming end of the Republican Party | Main | Lance Mannion's Sure-fire Are You an Optimist or a Pessimist Test »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451be5969e200d8349798de53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Not gonna grind my teeth over Grindhouse:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Rob

Huh. I didn't think Death Proof was mysoginist at all.

About Tarantino and the genre thing, I don't know. All of his films have been genre films; the first three were in the "crime" genre, which for various reasons is recognized as respectable by major critics. I am a fan neither of martial arts films nor of B movies, but I quite enjoyed both the Kill Bill movies and Grindhouse.

I had the same thought, for a while, about these movies; when will Tarantino quit this nonsense and get back to making REAL films, something that he obviously has the talent to do. But the more I thought about it, the less defensible that argument seemed. Film is about pleasure, and if he wants to make movies of the sort that he enjoys watching, then who I am to say that he shouldn't? More importantly, there's something absurd about saying that a gangster film is "serious" and a martial arts film not; we are to believe this because Coppola and Scorcese prefer the former over the latter?

tdraicer

>Yet in Death Proof, black suited guys are replaced by hotties in baby tees and tight pants, and the results come off as little more than male geek fantasy – gorgeous young women sitting around dropping references to Zatoichi, obscure British rock bands, and 70s cult cinema. It’s unbelievably juvenile, and more than a little pathetic

Well the problem with that argument is that from what I've read Rosario Dawson (at least) is as much a full-blown cult film/comic book geek as QT, and would quite likely have that sort of conversation.

Uma

Lance, I was lost; adrift on a sea of confusion and was trying to find myself in Quentin's eyes. I should have known I was going to the wrong place. But... didn't you like the jumpsuit?

Jessica

(Found you via Tomato Nation.)

It's funny, because while I didn't love Pulp Fiction and haven't seen (or tried to see) any other QT film, I was blown away by the Kill Bill films. One thing I haven't been able to figure out since watching them and writing about them -- since I haven't run into a lot of women writing about the KB movies -- is how much reactions to KB run along gendered lines. I saw it and felt that Uma Thurman wasn't wasted at all, and that the movie(s) were, if maybe not feminist, very female-centered -- the interactions about honor, power, and responsibility were all (with the exception of the dialogues between Beatrix and Bill) between women. But I don't know how much of my reaction is due to the fact that I was a woman thinking about my own fertility and sexuality when I saw the films, and whether my reaction would have been different had I not known, going on, that Uma Thurman was a mom going through a nasty divorce.

tom

Planet Terror has rewarding hilarities; Death Proof is more engaged with what movies are. I was disappointed with the "action" - it seemed, despite its claims to authentic stuntwork, to depend on a suspension of disbelief I was not persuaded to be willing to provide.

And one can get lost in the jungle of misogynist/misanthropist reactions. Initially I thought, he's turned off his mind and is dissolving into sheer technique. What came back to me after the initial rush of adrenalized juissance had to do with the use of stunt people in Death Proof, and digital scratch lines. Kurt Russell playing a stunt man who uses his stunt car to inflict actual (simulated) nonstunt violence upon actors playing real people, one of said actors is a stunt woman who actually performs an extraordiary elongated "stunt" that is usually reserved for stunt doubles.

The film is at least thinking about reality, cinema, and stunt.

Campaspe

"But Wes Anderson and the Coens – and for that matter, Jean-Pierre Jeunet and Marc Caro, who are also highly, highly, highly stylized, contraptionist filmmakers have all moved me more than Tarantino. Even when their movies are overscaled, overcontrolled or boring, they touch my feelings in a way that Tarantino doesn’t. If Tarantino’s a preacher, I’d say he’s Elmer Gantry. I don’t believe in anything he says."

What Seitz said. And how.

burritoboy


Compare Linklater with Tarantino. They both emerged at the opening moment for indie film after Sex, Lies and Videotape. Linklater has far more range: he's made several comedies, two animated movies, a science fiction movie, a Western/gangster, two high school comedies, a sports movie, a theater piece (Tape), several undefinable pieces and two romance movies. Tarantino's made only action movies at half of Linklater's speed.

Compare Before Sunrise / Before Sunset to any Tarantino and see the difference.

Rob

burritoboy,

Before Sunset is perhaps the worst monstrosity ever committed to celluloid. Linklater has demonstrated little other than the capacity to make bad, pretentious, and annoying films in just about every genre.

burritoboy


"Before Sunset is perhaps the worst monstrosity ever committed to celluloid"

Er...............yeah, sure, whatever you say boss.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

The Tip Jar


  • Please help keep this blog running strong with your donation or subscription
  • Contact by Snail Mail
    Lance Mannion
    PO Box 263
    New Paltz, NY 12561
    USA



Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    **********


    • Rolex Watches

    Be Smart, Buy Books


    Movies, Music, Books, Kindles, and more

    May 2013

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31  

    For All Your Laundry Needs

    Blog powered by TypePad

    In Case of Typepad Emergency Break Glass